GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs Quadro M5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with GeForce GTX 980M SLI, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
24.37

GTX 980M SLI outperforms Quadro M5000 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking208203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.5619.76
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGM204no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)7 October 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data
Current price$823 (0.3x MSRP)$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980M SLI has 131% better value for money than Quadro M5000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed861 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1127 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million2x 5200 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate132.9no data
Floating-point performance4,252 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5000 and GeForce GTX 980M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2x 8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereono data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model5no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan++
CUDA5.2+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p130−140
−3.8%
135
+3.8%
Full HD110−120
−3.6%
114
+3.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−7.5%
40−45
+7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−8%
80−85
+8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−7%
100−110
+7%
Hitman 3 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−3.2%
95−100
+3.2%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−10%
65−70
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−7.5%
40−45
+7.5%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−8%
80−85
+8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−7%
100−110
+7%
Hitman 3 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−3.2%
95−100
+3.2%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−10%
65−70
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−7.5%
40−45
+7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−3.6%
55−60
+3.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
−7%
100−110
+7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−3.2%
95−100
+3.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−10%
65−70
+10%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−4%
50−55
+4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−7.5%
40−45
+7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−2%
50−55
+2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−8%
50−55
+8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−13.3%
30−35
+13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

This is how Quadro M5000 and GTX 980M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M SLI is 4% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M SLI is 4% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.37 24.75
Recency 29 June 2015 7 October 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M5000 and GeForce GTX 980M SLI.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 59 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 53 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.