GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M5000

Place in the ranking	229	346
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.01	4.18
Power efficiency	11.19	4.61
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM204	GK104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,856.99	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770 has 39% better value for money than Quadro M5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1536
Core clock speed	861 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1085 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	230 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	98 °C
Texture fill rate	132.9	138.9
Floating-point processing power	4.252 TFLOPS	3.333 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	128	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2" (5.1 cm)	2-slot
Minimum recommended system power	no data	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	256 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1653 MHz	1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 211 GB/s	224.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync	no data
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
PhysX	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+
ECC (Error Correcting Code)	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.2	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5000 24.29
+58.4%

GTX 770 15.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M5000 9371
+58.4%

GTX 770 5915

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro M5000 29514
+64.5%

GTX 770 17939

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Quadro M5000 32925
+86.3%

GTX 770 17674

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Quadro M5000 24565
+78.2%

GTX 770 13785

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Quadro M5000 85
+49.1%

GTX 770 57

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.29	15.33
Recency	29 June 2015	30 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	230 Watt

Quadro M5000 has a 58.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 770 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.