NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Intel UHD Graphics 630

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Intel Gen. 9.5
Code name
GM204
 
Coffee Lake GT2
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Desktop
Release date
18 August 2015
 
1 September 2017

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
184
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
1150 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
15 Watt
Texture fill rate
78
 
26.45
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
423.2 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
n/d
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x1
Width
n/d
 
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
n/d

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
System Shared
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
System Shared
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
System Shared
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
n/d
Shared memory
-
 
+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630.
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
5.2
 
-
Quick Sync
n/d
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
DirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
n/d

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
25.81 +325.9%
 
6.06 −325.9%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
n/d
 
104913.00
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204.00 +386.5%
 
10114.00 −386.5%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937.00 +467.7%
 
1222.00 −467.7%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723.00 +482.9%
 
1325.00 −482.9%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259.00 +451.6%
 
1860.00 −451.6%
3DMark Vantage Performance
n/d
 
7704.00
Unigine Heaven 3.0
n/d
 
18.90
Passmark
4365
 
n/d
Octane Render OctaneBench
53
 
n/d

Mining hashrate

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
 
n/d

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
22.22 +13787.5%
 
0.16 −13787.5%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
19.10
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
18.30
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
low / 720p
n/d
 
24.90
Battlefield 1 (BF1) (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
39.30
medium / 768p
n/d
 
23.50
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
20.25
Far Cry Primal (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
24.50
Overwatch (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
62.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
41.50
high / 1080p
n/d
 
19.50
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
low / 768p
n/d
 
24.65
medium / 768p
90.00
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55.00
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48.00
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20.00
 
n/d
The Division (2016)
low / 720p
n/d
 
27.10
Dota 2 (2015)
low / 720p
n/d
 
75.90
medium / 768p
n/d
 
47.75
high / 1080p
n/d
 
21.85
ultra / 1080p
n/d
 
19.30
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
51.70
medium / 768p
n/d
 
32.50

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

325.9% faster (about 4.5 times) in synthetic tests
13787.5% faster (about 139 times) in games

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

Much newer (1 September 2017 vs 18 August 2015)
More pipelines (184 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 100 watts)
QuickSync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)

So, Quadro M4000M or UHD Graphics 630?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and UHD Graphics 630, ask them in Comments sections, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or UHD Graphics 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.