NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD Radeon R9 M375
Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
78 GTexel / s
40.6 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
160 GB / s
28.8 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
M4000M 24.29 +594%
R9 M375 3.50
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
M4000M 49204 +481.2%
R9 M375 8466
3DMark Fire Strike Score
M4000M 6937 +358.2%
R9 M375 1514
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
M4000M 7723 +363.3%
R9 M375 1667
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
M4000M 10259 +209.6%
R9 M375 3314
M4000M 4674 +277.2%
R9 M375 1239
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +75.5%
143 Mh/s −75.5%
Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
594% faster (about 7 times) in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (18 August 2015 vs 5 May 2015)
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 28.8 GB/s)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M375
More pipelines (640 vs 1)
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1)
Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
PowerTune (dynamically increases AMD GPU's voltage and frequency while there's still enough temperature headroom. Similar to NVIDIA GPU Boost)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Eyefinity (allows using several displays with an AMD GPU)
So, Quadro M4000M or R9 M375?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.
Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon R9 M375 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.