NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs CX

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA Quadro CX

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Perfomance to price
n/d
 
11.90
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
Tesla 2.0
Code name
GM204
 
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Workstation
Release date
18 August 2015
 
11 November 2008
Launch price (MSRP)
n/d
 
1,999 USD
Price
n/d
 
149.95 USD

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
192
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
602 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
n/d
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
150 Watt
Texture fill rate
78
 
38.5
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
462.3 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
n/d
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 2.0 x16
Length
n/d
 
267 mm
Width
n/d
 
2-slot
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
1x 6-pin

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
1.5 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
76.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
n/d

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX.
Display Connectors
n/d
 
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
5.2
 
1.3

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
n/d
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
n/d

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
25.81 +338.2%
 
5.89 −338.2%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204.00
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937.00
 
n/d
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723.00
 
n/d
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259.00
 
n/d
Passmark
4365 +360.9%
 
947 −360.9%
Octane Render OctaneBench
53
 
n/d

Mining hashrate

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
 
n/d

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
22.22 +8129.6%
 
0.27 −8129.6%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90.00
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55.00
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48.00
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20.00
 
n/d

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

338.2% faster (about 4.5 times) in synthetic tests
8129.6% faster (about 82.5 times) in games
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 11 November 2008)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 76.8 GB/s)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 55 nm)
Less power hungry (100 vs 150 watts)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro CX

Wider memory bus (384 vs 256 bit)
More pipelines (192 vs 1)

So, Quadro M4000M or CX?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro CX is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and Quadro CX, ask them in Comments sections, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA Quadro CX
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or Quadro CX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.