NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD FirePro W2100

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro W2100

General info

Comparison of Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
 
GCN 1.0
Code name
GM204
 
Oland
Type
Mobile workstation
 
Workstation
Release date
18 August 2015
 
12 August 2014

Technical specs

Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Pipelines
1,280
 
320
Core clock speed
975 MHz
 
630 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
 
680 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
 
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
400 Watt
Texture fill rate
78
 
13.6
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
 
435.2 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
n/d
Bus support
n/d
 
PCIe 3.0
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x8
Width
n/d
 
1-slot
Form factor
n/d
 
low profile / half length
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
n/a
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
 
2 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
 
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
 
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100.
Display Connectors
n/d
 
2x DisplayPort
Display Port
1.2
 
n/d
DisplayPort count
n/d
 
2
Dual-link DVI support
-
 
+

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
AppAcceleration
-
 
+
3D Vision Pro
+
 
n/d
Mosaic
+
 
n/d
nView Display Management
+
 
n/d
Optimus
+
 
n/d
CUDA
5.2
 
-
PowerPlay
n/d
 
+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12
 
DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.0
 
n/d
OpenGL
4.5
 
n/d

Video card benchmarks performance comparison

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
25.81 +648.1%
 
3.45 −648.1%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
49204.00 +533.2%
 
7771.00 −533.2%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6937.00 +569.6%
 
1036.00 −569.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
7723.00 +611.8%
 
1085.00 −611.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
10259.00
 
n/d
Unigine Heaven 3.0
n/d
 
14.90
Passmark
4365
 
n/d
Octane Render OctaneBench
53
 
n/d

Rendering quality tests

GFXBench render quality
4541 −0.2%
 
4549 +0.2%
GFXBench high precision render quality
4541 −0.2%
 
4549 +0.2%

Mining hashrate

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s +373.6%
 
53 Mh/s −373.6%

Game benchmarks comparison (in FPS)

Let's see how good Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS, while overall gaming performance is a number in 0-100 range, and the older the game, the less impact it has on the overall grade.
Overall gaming performance
22.22 +222100%
 
0.01 −222100%
Games benchmarked by notebookcheck.net
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
medium / 768p
90.00
 
n/d
high / 1080p
55.00
 
n/d
ultra / 1080p
48.00
 
n/d
4k / 2160p
20.00
 
n/d
The Witcher 3 (2015)
low / 768p
n/d
 
17.00
medium / 768p
n/d
 
10.00

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

648.1% faster (about 7.5 times) in synthetic tests
222100% faster (about 2222 times) in games
Much newer (18 August 2015 vs 12 August 2014)
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 28.8 GB/s)
Less power hungry (100 vs 400 watts)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W2100

More pipelines (320 vs 1)
App Acceleration
PowerPlay
PowerTune (dynamically increases AMD GPU's voltage and frequency while there's still enough temperature headroom. Similar to NVIDIA GPU Boost)
ZeroCore
PCI Express 3.0 x16
max. 2 Displays
Dual-link DVI support
AppAcceleration

So, Quadro M4000M or FirePro W2100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M4000M.

Be aware that Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation card while FirePro W2100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000M and FirePro W2100, ask them in Comments sections, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
AMD FirePro W2100
Like
Like

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Comparisons

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M4000M or FirePro W2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.