NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs Tesla M60
Comparison of Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
2x 4,833 gflops
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60.
DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Number of simultaneous displays
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
High-Performance Video I/O6
nView Desktop Management
APIs supported by Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro M4000 29.06
Tesla M60 32.17 +10.7%
Quadro M4000 6489
Tesla M60 6923 +6.7%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s −44.5%
432 Mh/s +44.5%
Let's see how good Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Less power hungry (120 vs 300 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA Tesla M60
10.7% faster in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (30 August 2015 vs 29 June 2015)
More pipelines (2048 vs 1664)
So, Quadro M4000 or Tesla M60?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Tesla M60.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M4000 and Tesla M60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.