Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs Quadro M4000

Place in performance ranking	297	393
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.17	5.12
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	GM204	Polaris 11
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	29 June 2015 (9 years ago)	5 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$791	no data
Current price	$314 (0.4x MSRP)	$520

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M4000 has 118% better value for money than RX 560X Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1664	1024
Core clock speed	773 MHz	1172 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1275 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	60-80 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.39	81.60
Floating-point performance	2,573 gflops	2,611 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000 and Radeon RX 560X Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 192 GB/s	92.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
High-Performance Video I/O6	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

55−60
+52.8%

−52.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+52.2%

−52.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +40%	25 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30 −50%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +53.1%	49 −53.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +41.2%	17 −41.2%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +42.9%	35 −42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +54.8%	42 −54.8%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +53.8%	52 −53.8%
Hitman 3	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +55.6%	45 −55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +48.9%	47 −48.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +47.1%	51 −47.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +55.2%	29 −55.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +52.8%	36 −52.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +40%	15 −40%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +55.2%	29 −55.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +42.9%	28 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +52.4%	105 −52.4%
Hitman 3	35−40 +52.2%	23 −52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +42.9%	35 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +42.9%	35 −42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +54.8%	42 −54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +52.8%	36 −52.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +53.8%	35−40 −53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +44.7%	38 −44.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +48.6%	37 −48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +45.5%	11 −45.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+50%

−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +42.1%	18−20 −42.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Hitman 3	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +52.2%	21−24 −52.2%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +50%	16−18 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+50%

18−20

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Hitman 3	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+40%

10−11

−40%

This is how Quadro M4000 and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro M4000 is 53% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.28	11.09
Recency	29 June 2015	5 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	60 Watt