Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Quadro M2200

Place in performance ranking	394	169
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.00	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	N17P-Q3	Navi 33
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$1967	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2048
Core clock speed	694 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	2300 MHz
Number of transistors	1870 Million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	66.30	320.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 7600M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5508 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.02

RX 7600M XT 30.36
+175%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 175% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2200 4261

RX 7600M XT 11741
+176%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 176% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 7372

RX 7600M XT 36365
+393%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 393% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 24622

RX 7600M XT 93477
+280%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 280% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 5850

RX 7600M XT 28271
+383%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 383% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 37796

RX 7600M XT 152894
+305%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 305% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro M2200 289176

RX 7600M XT 418181
+44.6%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 45% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 47

RX 7600M XT 202
+330%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 330% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 86

RX 7600M XT 218
+153%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 153% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 58

RX 7600M XT 186
+220%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 220% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 72

RX 7600M XT 230
+219%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 219% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 69

RX 7600M XT 87
+27%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 27% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 25

RX 7600M XT 112
+353%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 353% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 33

RX 7600M XT 119
+261%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 261% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 5

RX 7600M XT 25
+377%

Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms Quadro M2200 by 377% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	42 −164%	111 +164%
1440p	21−24 −181%	59 +181%
4K	13 −162%	34 +162%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−200%

50−55
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −443%	125 +443%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −741%	143 +741%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −183%	95−100 +183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −179%	65−70 +179%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −113%	65−70 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −158%	80−85 +158%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −524%	237 +524%
Hitman 3	24−27 −200%	75−80 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −583%	246 +583%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −336%	144 +336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −152%	75−80 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −719%	254 +719%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −616%	136 +616%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −396%	114 +396%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −582%	116 +582%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −183%	95−100 +183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −179%	65−70 +179%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −65.6%	53 +65.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −71%	53 +71%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −513%	233 +513%
Hitman 3	24−27 −200%	75−80 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −444%	196 +444%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −218%	105 +218%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −152%	75−80 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −403%	156 +403%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 −365%	172 +365%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −547%	123 +547%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −243%	79 +243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −447%	93 +447%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −179%	65−70 +179%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −113%	65−70 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −358%	174 +358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −272%	134 +272%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −185%	94 +185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −400%	100 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −158%	49 +158%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−152%

75−80
+152%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −164%	55−60 +164%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −553%	124 +553%
Hitman 3	14−16 −180%	40−45 +180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −445%	60 +445%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −857%	67 +857%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −231%	40−45 +231%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −494%	101 +494%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −590%	138 +590%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −343%	102 +343%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −435%	91 +435%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −644%	119 +644%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −555%	72 +555%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −467%	34 +467%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	24−27 −56%	39 +56%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −890%	99 +890%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −227%	35−40 +227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −450%	33 +450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −300%	52 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −383%	29 +383%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −480%	29 +480%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −536%	89 +536%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −445%	60 +445%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −409%	56 +409%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −325%	17 +325%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−160%

24−27
+160%

This is how Quadro M2200 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 164% faster in 1080p
RX 7600M XT is 181% faster in 1440p
RX 7600M XT is 162% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 890% faster than the Quadro M2200.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7600M XT surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.02	30.36
Recency	13 January 2017	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	120 Watt