Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Quadro M2200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
11.03

RX 7600 XT outperforms M2200 by a whopping 305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42381
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.94
Power efficiency13.7416.10
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM206Navi 33
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed695 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate66.30352.6
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPS22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.03
RX 7600 XT 44.67
+305%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4250
RX 7600 XT 17209
+305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−286%
170−180
+286%
4K14
−293%
55−60
+293%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.94
4Kno data5.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Hitman 3 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Hitman 3 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−297%
290−300
+297%
Hitman 3 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−290%
230−240
+290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−300%
80−85
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−292%
200−210
+292%
Hitman 3 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−291%
270−280
+291%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−300%
200−210
+300%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−285%
50−55
+285%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%

This is how Quadro M2200 and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 286% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 XT is 293% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.03 44.67
Recency 11 January 2017 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 190 Watt

Quadro M2200 has 245.5% lower power consumption.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 305% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 376 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 609 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.