Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro M2200

Place in performance ranking	394	581
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.00	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code name	N17P-Q3	Skylake GT4e
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$1967	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	72
Core clock speed	694 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	1870 Million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	75.60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	eDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5508 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.97
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.01
+111%

Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.23

Quadro M2200 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2200 4252
+110%

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020

Quadro M2200 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics P580 by 110% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 +139%	18−21 −139%
4K	13 +117%	6−7 −117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Forza Horizon 4	20−22	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24	no data
Metro Exodus	16−18	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9	no data
Hitman 3	7−8	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	6−7	no data
Forza Horizon 4	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12	no data
Metro Exodus	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

no data

This is how Quadro M2200 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 compete in popular games:

Quadro M2200 is 139% faster in 1080p
Quadro M2200 is 117% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.01	5.23
Recency	13 January 2017	1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt