GeForce GT 1030 vs Quadro M2200

Place in performance ranking	394	544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	26
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.00	2.42
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N17P-Q3	N17P-G1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	17 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$79
Current price	$1967	$137 (1.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 1030 has 142% better value for money than Quadro M2200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	384
Core clock speed	694 MHz	1228 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1670 MHz
Number of transistors	1870 Million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	35.23
Floating-point performance	no data	1,127 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and GeForce GT 1030 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5508 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI	no data	+
Display Port	1.2	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.01
+72.6%

GT 1030 6.38

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2200 4252
+72.5%

GT 1030 2465

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 72% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 7372
+55.9%

GT 1030 4728

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 56% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 24622
+21.9%

GT 1030 20192

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 22% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 5850
+61.4%

GT 1030 3625

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 61% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 37796
+71.3%

GT 1030 22069

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 71% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M2200 12804
+31.9%

GT 1030 9711

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 32% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Quadro M2200 289176
+31.9%

GT 1030 219163

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 32% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro M2200 15742
+67.5%

GT 1030 9396

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 68% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M2200 12812
+24.3%

GT 1030 10307

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 24% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 47
+42.6%

GT 1030 33

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 43% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 86
+242%

GT 1030 25

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 242% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 58
+1609%

GT 1030 3

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 1609% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 72
+296%

GT 1030 18

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 296% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 69
+485%

GT 1030 12

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 485% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 25
+144%

GT 1030 10

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 144% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro M2200 5
+940%

GT 1030 1

Quadro M2200 outperforms GeForce GT 1030 by 940% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 +79.2%	24 −79.2%
1440p	27−30 +58.8%	17 −58.8%
4K	13 +44.4%	9 −44.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	21−24	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Forza Horizon 4	21−24	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24	no data
Metro Exodus	16−18	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9	no data
Hitman 3	7−8	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	6−7	no data
Forza Horizon 4	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14	no data
Metro Exodus	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5	no data