Arc A550M vs Quadro M2200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.66

Arc A550M outperforms M2200 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking439240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.7028.04
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGM206DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed695 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate66.30262.4
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M2200 10.66
Arc A550M 23.80
+123%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M2200 5850
Arc A550M 14350
+145%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro M2200 1724
Arc A550M 5830
+238%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−121%
95−100
+121%
4K14
−114%
30−35
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−139%
130−140
+139%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−147%
45−50
+147%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
90−95
+102%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−139%
130−140
+139%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−126%
75−80
+126%
Fortnite 60−65
−87.1%
110−120
+87.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−107%
90−95
+107%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−147%
45−50
+147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
Valorant 95−100
−68.8%
160−170
+68.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
90−95
+102%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−139%
130−140
+139%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−64.3%
250−260
+64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Dota 2 70−75
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−126%
75−80
+126%
Fortnite 60−65
−87.1%
110−120
+87.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−107%
90−95
+107%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−131%
70−75
+131%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−118%
85−90
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−147%
45−50
+147%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−143%
50−55
+143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−83.8%
65−70
+83.8%
Valorant 95−100
−68.8%
160−170
+68.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
90−95
+102%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Dota 2 70−75
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−126%
75−80
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−107%
90−95
+107%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−147%
45−50
+147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−240%
65−70
+240%
Valorant 95−100
−68.8%
160−170
+68.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−87.1%
110−120
+87.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−168%
50−55
+168%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−108%
160−170
+108%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−180%
40−45
+180%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−192%
170−180
+192%
Valorant 110−120
−74.8%
200−210
+74.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−136%
50−55
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−153%
35−40
+153%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−105%
40−45
+105%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−162%
30−35
+162%
Valorant 55−60
−145%
130−140
+145%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−177%
35−40
+177%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Dota 2 35−40
−103%
75−80
+103%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−128%
40−45
+128%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%

This is how Quadro M2200 and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A550M is 121% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A550M is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A550M is 475% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A550M surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.66 23.80
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 60 Watt

Quadro M2200 has 9.1% lower power consumption.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 123.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A550M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Arc A550M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 387 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 81 vote

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2200 or Arc A550M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.