Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Quadro M2000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000M with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

M2000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
8.97
+26.9%

M2000M outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking485550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.3524.61
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
GPU code nameGM107no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date3 December 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1029 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1098 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate43.92no data
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.97
+26.9%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 7.07

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M2000M 5143
+27.5%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 4033

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M2000M 4157
+11.1%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 3742

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M2000M 29795
+6.6%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 27960

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+71.4%
21
−71.4%
4K12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+30.9%
55−60
−30.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how M2000M and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • M2000M is 71% faster in 1080p
  • M2000M is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.97 7.07
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 20 Watt

M2000M has a 26.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 175% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M2000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 496 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.