Quadro 410 vs M2000M

Place in performance ranking	454	1040
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.53	0.07
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GK107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	7 August 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149
Current price	$363	$41 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M2000M has 3514% better value for money than Quadro 410.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	192
Core clock speed	1038 MHz	706 MHz
Boost clock speed	1197 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	38 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.92	11.30
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	271.1 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000M and Quadro 410 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	176 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	14.26 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.95
+692%

Quadro 410 1.13

M2000M outperforms 410 by 692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M2000M 3458
+689%

Quadro 410 438

M2000M outperforms 410 by 689% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M2000M 9658
+568%

Quadro 410 1446

M2000M outperforms 410 by 568% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	32 +700%	4−5 −700%
4K	11 +1000%	1−2 −1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

110−120

+686%

14−16
−686%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +689%	18−20 −689%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +669%	12−14 −669%
Battlefield 5	210−220 +678%	27−30 −678%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +678%	18−20 −678%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +686%	14−16 −686%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +662%	21−24 −662%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +660%	24−27 −660%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +582%	40−45 −582%
Hitman 3	130−140 +665%	16−18 −665%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +669%	35−40 −669%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +678%	27−30 −678%
Red Dead Redemption 2	190−200 +660%	24−27 −660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +686%	27−30 −686%
Watch Dogs: Legion	260−270 +688%	30−35 −688%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +689%	18−20 −689%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +669%	12−14 −669%
Battlefield 5	210−220 +678%	27−30 −678%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +678%	18−20 −678%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +686%	14−16 −686%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +662%	21−24 −662%
Far Cry New Dawn	190−200 +660%	24−27 −660%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +582%	40−45 −582%
Hitman 3	130−140 +665%	16−18 −665%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +669%	35−40 −669%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +678%	27−30 −678%
Red Dead Redemption 2	190−200 +660%	24−27 −660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +686%	27−30 −686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 +683%	23 −683%
Watch Dogs: Legion	260−270 +688%	30−35 −688%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	150−160 +689%	18−20 −689%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +669%	12−14 −669%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	140−150 +678%	18−20 −678%
Cyberpunk 2077	110−120 +686%	14−16 −686%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +662%	21−24 −662%
Forza Horizon 4	300−310 +582%	40−45 −582%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +669%	35−40 −669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +686%	27−30 −686%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +686%	14 −686%
Watch Dogs: Legion	260−270 +688%	30−35 −688%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

190−200

+660%

24−27
−660%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +665%	16−18 −665%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +686%	14−16 −686%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +678%	9−10 −678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	85−90 +673%	10−12 −673%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +686%	14−16 −686%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +650%	16−18 −650%
Hitman 3	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +689%	18−20 −689%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +692%	12−14 −692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 +650%	10−11 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +650%	8−9 −650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+633%

14−16
−633%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +650%	8−9 −650%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +650%	6−7 −650%
Hitman 3	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +678%	9−10 −678%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 +678%	9 −678%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +673%	10−12 −673%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +678%	9−10 −678%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +678%	9−10 −678%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%