GRID M3-3020 vs Quadro M2000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M1000M M1200 M2000M M2200 M3000M M4000M M5000M M5500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000M with GRID M3-3020, including specs and performance data.

M2000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
8.12
+15.5%

M2000M outperforms M3-3020 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
M2000M M2000M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.39no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM107GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date3 December 2015 (9 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640640
Core clock speed1029 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1098 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.9252.24
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4040
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA5.05.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+20%
30−35
−20%
4K11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Fortnite 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Valorant 80−85
+20%
70−75
−20%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Dota 2 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Fortnite 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Valorant 80−85
+20%
70−75
−20%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Dota 2 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 80−85
+20%
70−75
−20%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Valorant 90−95
+16.3%
80−85
−16.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how M2000M and GRID M3-3020 compete in popular games:

  • M2000M is 20% faster in 1080p
  • M2000M is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.12 7.03
Recency 3 December 2015 18 May 2016

M2000M has a 15.5% higher aggregate performance score.

GRID M3-3020, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Quadro M2000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
HD 6490M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6490M Mac Edition
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
S7150 x2 FirePro S7150 x2
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
NVS 300 NVS 300
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
FX Go5200 64M GeForce FX Go5200 64M
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
GTX 950 Low Power GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
HD 8240 Mobile IGP Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
MX450 25W GeForce MX450 25W
K5000M Quadro K5000M
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 564 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2000M or GRID M3-3020, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.