NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD FirePro W5100
Comparison of Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
56.64 GTexel / s
44.64 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
1" (2.5 cm)
Full Height / Half Length
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
96 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100.
DP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displays
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Desktop Management
APIs supported by Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro M2000 9.92 +38.7%
FirePro W5100 7.15
Quadro M2000 4281 +42%
FirePro W5100 3014
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s +31.9%
163 Mh/s −31.9%
Let's see how good Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M2000
38.7% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (8 April 2016 vs 31 March 2014)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD FirePro W5100
Less power hungry (50 vs 75 watts)
So, Quadro M2000 or FirePro W5100?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M2000.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M2000 and FirePro W5100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.