Tesla M2090 vs Quadro M1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M1200 with Tesla M2090, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M1200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
7.94

Tesla M2090 outperforms M1200 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking548510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.752.62
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM107GF110
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed1093 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate43.7241.66
Floating-point processing power1.399 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.02.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30
+0%
30−35
+0%
4K11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Valorant 80−85
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Dota 2 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Valorant 80−85
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Dota 2 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Valorant 80−85
−12.5%
90−95
+12.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Valorant 85−90
−12.4%
100−105
+12.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dead Island 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Dota 2 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how Quadro M1200 and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • Tesla M2090 is 9% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 9.07
Recency 11 January 2017 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro M1200 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2090, on the other hand, has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 377 votes

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M1200 or Tesla M2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.