NVS 810 vs Quadro M1000M

Place in performance ranking	502	728
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.88	0.11
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	4 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	no data
Current price	$706 (3.5x MSRP)	$848

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M1000M has 700% better value for money than NVS 810.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	512
Core clock speed	993 MHz	902 MHz
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1033 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	68 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.78	33.06
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M1000M and NVS 810 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	198 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	8x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.42
+143%

NVS 810 3.05

Quadro M1000M outperforms NVS 810 by 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M1000M 2867
+143%

NVS 810 1179

Quadro M1000M outperforms NVS 810 by 143% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 +157%	14−16 −157%
4K	12 +200%	4−5 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30
+125%

12−14

−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +127%	21−24 −127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +136%	35−40 −136%
Hitman 3	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +125%	20−22 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +127%	21−24 −127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +136%	35−40 −136%
Hitman 3	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +125%	20−22 −125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +137%	19 −137%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +136%	35−40 −136%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +118%	11 −118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 +141%	27−30 −141%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+138%

21−24

−138%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +114%	14−16 −114%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Hitman 3	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +119%	16−18 −119%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+131%

12−14

−131%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Hitman 3	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +129%	7 −129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%