NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs Intel HD Graphics 530
Comparison of Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
M1000M 13.43 +190.7%
HD Graphics 530 4.62
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
M1000M 23422 +212.3%
HD Graphics 530 7500
3DMark Fire Strike Score
M1000M 3323 +278.5%
HD Graphics 530 878
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
M1000M 3498 +274.1%
HD Graphics 530 935
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
M1000M 4230 +210.6%
HD Graphics 530 1362
M1000M 2911 +190.8%
HD Graphics 530 1001
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
Let's see how good Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
190.7% faster (about 3 times) in synthetic tests
More pipelines (512 vs 192)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Pro
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 530
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 40 watts)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
So, Quadro M1000M or HD Graphics 530?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro M1000M.
Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics 530 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro M1000M and HD Graphics 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.