GeForce MX570 vs Quadro M1000M

Place in the ranking	543	362
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.19	no data
Power efficiency	12.74	40.94
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GM107	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2048
Core clock speed	993 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.78	73.92
Floating-point processing power	1.017 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	40
TMUs	32	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	+
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.0	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M1000M 7.10

GeForce MX570 14.26
+101%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2845

GeForce MX570 5712
+101%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	39 +2.6%	38 −2.6%
4K	16 −87.5%	30−35 +87.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.15	no data
4K	12.56	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −100%	45−50 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −116%	40−45 +116%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −71.4%	35−40 +71.4%
Valorant	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −100%	45−50 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%
Dota 2	24−27 +117%	12 −117%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −113%	68 +113%
Fortnite	40−45 −88.6%	80−85 +88.6%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −112%	50−55 +112%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −116%	40−45 +116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −78.3%	100−110 +78.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −71.4%	35−40 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Valorant	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%
World of Tanks	110−120 −70.8%	190−200 +70.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −100%	45−50 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%
Dota 2	24−27 −104%	50−55 +104%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −68.8%	50−55 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −78.3%	100−110 +78.3%
Valorant	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −256%	130−140 +256%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
World of Tanks	50−55 −96.2%	100−110 +96.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −140%	35−40 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −147%	35−40 +147%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −191%	30−35 +191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Valorant	18−20 −94.7%	35−40 +94.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −110%	40−45 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Fortnite	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Valorant	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

This is how M1000M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

M1000M is 3% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX570 is 88% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the M1000M is 117% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

M1000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
GeForce MX570 is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.10	14.26
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 100.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M1000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro M1000M

GeForce MX570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 579 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M1000M or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.