GeForce GT 755M vs Quadro M1000M

Place in performance ranking	499	630
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.83	0.86
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	N14P-
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	25 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	no data
Current price	$706 (3.5x MSRP)	$310

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 755M has 4% better value for money than M1000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	384
Core clock speed	993 MHz	980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.78	31.36
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	752.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M1000M and GeForce GT 755M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI-ready	no data	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	4 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	GDDR5
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	86.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP content protection	no data	+
Display Port	1.2	no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	no data	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	no data	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	no data	+
Optimus	+	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 API
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.42
+70.2%

GT 755M 4.36

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 70% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M1000M 2873
+70.3%

GT 755M 1687

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 70% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M1000M 4230
+51%

GT 755M 2801

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 51% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M1000M 3498
+66.1%

GT 755M 2106

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 66% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M1000M 23422
+56.5%

GT 755M 14967

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 56% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M1000M 8444
+69.2%

GT 755M 4990

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 69% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

M1000M 7770
+83.9%

GT 755M 4226

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 84% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M1000M 45
+61.5%

GT 755M 28

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 62% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M1000M 24
+71.4%

GT 755M 14

Quadro M1000M outperforms GeForce GT 755M by 71% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95−100 +69.6%	56 −69.6%
Full HD	39 +77.3%	22 −77.3%
4K	13 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14
+50%

8−9

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Hitman 3	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Hitman 3	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +111%	9−10 −111%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Hitman 3	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%