Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs Quadro K620

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking593not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.37no data
Power efficiency8.88no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGM107Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1058 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.980.25
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length160 mm168 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitDDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX126.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

Quadro K620 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K620 and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K620 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 603 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.