GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs Quadro K620

#ad 
Buy
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 Quadro K620 Quadro K1200 Quadro K2200 Tesla M10
VS
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3060 Max-Q RTX 3060 Mobile RTX 3070 Max-Q RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q RTX 3070 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Max-Q RTX 3080 Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620 with GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620
2014
2 GB 128-bit, 41 Watt
5.57

RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms K620 by a whopping 464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
RTX 3060 Mobile RTX 3060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking614183
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.82no data
Power efficiency8.7627.76
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGM107GA106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843840
Core clock speed1058 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate26.98171.0
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS10.94 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs24120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA5.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K620 5.57
RTX 3060 Mobile 31.39
+464%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620 2225
RTX 3060 Mobile 12550
+464%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−506%
97
+506%
1440p10−12
−540%
64
+540%
4K6−7
−550%
39
+550%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.87no data
1440p18.99no data
4K31.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 88
+0%
88
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 121
+0%
121
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 189
+0%
189
+0%
Battlefield 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
+0%
78
+0%
Valorant 172
+0%
172
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75
+0%
75
+0%
Metro Exodus 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 304
+0%
304
+0%
Battlefield 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 42
+0%
42
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+0%
73
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 25
+0%
25
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro K620 and RTX 3060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 506% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 540% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Mobile is 550% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.57 31.39
Recency 22 July 2014 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 80 Watt

Quadro K620 has 95.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 463.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
RTX 3060 Mobile GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
vs
RX 6600S Radeon RX 6600S
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
P106-090 P106 090
R5 230 Radeon R5 230
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
GTX 1660 Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Mobile
vs
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon 530 Radeon 530
vs
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
R4 (Kaveri) Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
vs
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
RTX 4090 Ti RTX 4090 Ti
vs
GTX 670 GTX 670
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
vs
RX 590 RX 590
GT 710M GeForce GT 710M
vs
GTX 1050 Ti GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7
674 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1
5225 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620 or GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.