Radeon R7 M520 vs GRID K120Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Oland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (11 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192320
Core clock speed850 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6020.60
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs1620
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

R7 M520 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K120Q and Radeon R7 M520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K120Q is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 M520 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K120Q
GRID K120Q
AMD Radeon R7 M520
Radeon R7 M520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GRID K120Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 23 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K120Q or Radeon R7 M520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.