RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Quadro K610M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K610M with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K610M
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.86

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms K610M by a whopping 3328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.21no data
Power efficiency4.2533.63
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK208AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1926144
Core clock speed980 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors915 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate15.68417.6
Floating-point processing power0.3763 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth20.8 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K610M 1.86
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 63.77
+3328%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K610M 718
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24572
+3322%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro K610M 1993
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 148137
+7333%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro K610M 1867
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 119008
+6274%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−3082%
350−400
+3082%

Cost per frame, $

1080p20.91no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−3300%
170−180
+3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−3300%
170−180
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−3135%
550−600
+3135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−3186%
1150−1200
+3186%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−3300%
170−180
+3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−3300%
170−180
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−3135%
550−600
+3135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−3186%
1150−1200
+3186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−3300%
170−180
+3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−3135%
550−600
+3135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−3186%
1150−1200
+3186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−3233%
200−210
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−3300%
170−180
+3300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

This is how Quadro K610M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 3082% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 63.77
Recency 23 July 2013 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 130 Watt

Quadro K610M has 333.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 3328.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K610M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Quadro K610M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate Quadro K610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.