UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 K40d K40m K40s K40st K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile 710 Mobile 730 (Rocket Lake) 750 (Alder Lake) 770 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K6000 with UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

Quadro K6000
2013, $5,265
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
19.11
+53.4%

K6000 outperforms Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking318432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Power efficiency6.5263.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK110BRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed797 MHzno data
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate216.5no data
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs240no data
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
+50%
12
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p292.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Quadro K6000 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K6000 is 50% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.11 12.46
Recency 23 July 2013 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro K6000 has a 53.4% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
R9 290X R9 290X
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
K2000D K2000D
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
Pro W5700X Pro W5700X
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
Plex 1000 Model IV Plex 1000 Model IV
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
Quadro P500 P500
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
Xbox XGPU-S Xbox XGPU S
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 114 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 133 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K6000 or UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.