Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 K40d K40m K40s K40st K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K6000 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

Quadro K6000
2013, $5,265
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
19.17
+103%

K6000 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Power efficiency6.56no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe LPG (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGK110BMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28804
Core clock speed797 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate216.5no data
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs240no data
L1 Cache240 KB768 KB
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+100%
20
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p131.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Quadro K6000 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K6000 is 100% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 19.17 9.45
Recency 23 July 2013 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Quadro K6000 has a 103% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro K6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arc)
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
R7 M380 R7 M380
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
GTX 660M Mac Edition GTX 660M Mac Edition
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
RX 580X RX 580X
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
FX 5800 Ultra FX 5800 Ultra
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
RX 560DX RX 560DX
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
R5 A220 R5 A220
GRID K100 GRID K100
vs
RTX 3060 GA104 RTX 3060 GA104

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 115 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K6000 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.