Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs Quadro K6000 SDI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.36
Power efficiencyno data6.97
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK110Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,599 $4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28803840
Core clock speed902 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1967 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)239 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate216.5472.1
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs240240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Length267 mm267 mm
Width3-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 239 Watt 400 Watt

K6000 SDI has 67.4% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K6000 SDI and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
Quadro K6000 SDI
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 39 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X Duo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.