Tesla M10 vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 and Tesla M10, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
13.66
+104%

K5200 outperforms Tesla M10 by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.28no data
Power efficiency7.252.37
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGK110BGM107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304640 ×4
Core clock speed667 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate148.052.24 ×4
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs4816 ×4
TMUs19240 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s83.2 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA3.55.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5200 13.66
+104%
Tesla M10 6.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6108
+104%
Tesla M10 2994

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro K5200 13735
+17.2%
Tesla M10 11721

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.66 6.70
Recency 22 July 2014 18 May 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro K5200 has a 103.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% lower power consumption.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Quadro K5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M10 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or Tesla M10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.