Radeon RX 6800 XT vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 K40d K40m K40s K40st K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5900 5900 XT 5950 5950 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with Radeon RX 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
14.01

6800 XT outperforms K5200 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
RX 6800 XT RX 6800 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9144.08
Power efficiency7.5415.21
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK110BNavi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6800 XT has 4744% better value for money than Quadro K5200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23044608
Core clock speed667 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0648.0
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs192288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA3.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5200 14.01
RX 6800 XT 56.49
+303%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5200 6192
Samples: 377
RX 6800 XT 24971
+303%
Samples: 6478

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
−333%
195
+333%
1440p30−35
−360%
138
+360%
4K21−24
−338%
92
+338%

Cost per frame, $

1080p37.77
−1035%
3.33
+1035%
1440p56.66
−1105%
4.70
+1105%
4K80.94
−1047%
7.05
+1047%
  • RX 6800 XT has 1035% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT has 1105% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT has 1047% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 191
+0%
191
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 183
+0%
183
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Far Cry 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294
+0%
294
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175
+0%
175
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160
+0%
160
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154
+0%
154
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110
+0%
110
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro K5200 and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 333% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 360% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 338% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.01 56.49
Recency 22 July 2014 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro K5200 has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 303.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
RTX 5070 SUPER RTX 5070 SUPER
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
vs
RTX 5080 SUPER RTX 5080 SUPER
Tesla K80m Tesla K80m
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 5070 SUPER RTX 5070 SUPER
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
RTX 5080 SUPER RTX 5080 SUPER
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
RTX 5080 SUPER RTX 5080 SUPER
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4000 Mobile
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
HD 6450 OEM HD 6450 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 51 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4252 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or Radeon RX 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.