GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
15.64

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro K5200 by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking320120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.3619.43
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGK110BN18E-G2R
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data
Current price$451 (0.3x MSRP)$1443

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has 206% better value for money than Quadro K5200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed667 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0220.8
Floating-point performance3,553 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K5200 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz14002 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA3.57.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−142%
121
+142%
1440p30−35
−163%
79
+163%
4K18−20
−150%
45
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−122%
140−150
+122%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
−131%
240−250
+131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
−129%
190−200
+129%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−129%
270−280
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 115
−126%
260−270
+126%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−122%
140−150
+122%
Far Cry 5 146
−105%
300−310
+105%
Far Cry New Dawn 162
−116%
350−400
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Hitman 3 105
−129%
240−250
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
−108%
350−400
+108%
Metro Exodus 144
−108%
300−310
+108%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
−127%
270−280
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Watch Dogs: Legion 104
−131%
240−250
+131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90
−122%
200−210
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
−125%
160−170
+125%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−129%
270−280
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
−128%
230−240
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−122%
140−150
+122%
Far Cry 5 119
−127%
270−280
+127%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
−132%
260−270
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Hitman 3 52
−131%
120−130
+131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−104%
300−310
+104%
Metro Exodus 124
−126%
280−290
+126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 114
−128%
260−270
+128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
−115%
350−400
+115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−128%
210−220
+128%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
−122%
140−150
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
−130%
140−150
+130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
−127%
170−180
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−122%
140−150
+122%
Far Cry 5 83
−129%
190−200
+129%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
−131%
280−290
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
−130%
200−210
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
−130%
140−150
+130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
−131%
250−260
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−129%
160−170
+129%
Far Cry New Dawn 121
−131%
280−290
+131%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
−132%
130−140
+132%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−125%
90−95
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70
−129%
160−170
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−127%
150−160
+127%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−127%
170−180
+127%
Hitman 3 61
−130%
140−150
+130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−131%
180−190
+131%
Metro Exodus 89
−125%
200−210
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−130%
200−210
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 44
−127%
100−105
+127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
−126%
190−200
+126%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−122%
80−85
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−132%
95−100
+132%
Hitman 3 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
−130%
85−90
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
−120%
130−140
+120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
−122%
80−85
+122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−119%
70−75
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Far Cry 5 31
−126%
70−75
+126%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%
Metro Exodus 50
−120%
110−120
+120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−120%
55−60
+120%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
−133%
100−105
+133%

This is how Quadro K5200 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 142% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 163% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.64 36.49
Recency 22 July 2014 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 115 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 388 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.