GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K1200 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D Quadro K2200 Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 SYNC Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
15.79
+35.8%

K5200 outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking340409
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency7.3210.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK110BGP107B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304640
Core clock speed667 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate148.059.72
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs19240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4000 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Anselno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.5+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95−100
+30.1%
73
−30.1%
Full HD60−65
+30.4%
46
−30.4%
1440p30−35
+25%
24
−25%
4K18−21
+20%
15
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.33no data
1440p56.66no data
4K94.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+0%
37
+0%
Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+0%
30
+0%
Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+0%
17
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+0%
13
+0%
Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+0%
8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+0%
7
+0%
Battlefield 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%

This is how Quadro K5200 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K5200 is 30% faster in 900p
  • Quadro K5200 is 30% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K5200 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro K5200 is 20% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.79 11.63
Recency 22 July 2014 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4000 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro K5200 has a 35.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro V7350X2
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
GT 745M GeForce GT 745M
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
R7 M270 Radeon R7 M270

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 42 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.