GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Quadro K510M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro K510M with GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms K510M by a whopping 2969% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1007 | 82 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.92 | 72.14 |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GK208 | GB206 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 (12 years ago) | April 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | 21,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 | 205.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.3249 TFLOPS | 13.13 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 48 |
| TMUs | 16 | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| Display Port | 1.2 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.4 |
| CUDA | + | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−3733%
| 115
+3733%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−3300%
| 68
+3300%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−4500%
| 46
+4500%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−25100%
|
250−260
+25100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3700%
|
110−120
+3700%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−4833%
|
140−150
+4833%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−22100%
|
222
+22100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3700%
|
110−120
+3700%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5
−2925%
|
120−130
+2925%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−3600%
|
140−150
+3600%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−3960%
|
200−210
+3960%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1922%
|
180−190
+1922%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−7300%
|
140−150
+7300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1610%
|
170−180
+1610%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−631%
|
260−270
+631%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−4833%
|
140−150
+4833%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−16200%
|
163
+16200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
−718%
|
270−280
+718%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3700%
|
110−120
+3700%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−2795%
|
550−600
+2795%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5
−2925%
|
120−130
+2925%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−3600%
|
140−150
+3600%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−3960%
|
200−210
+3960%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1922%
|
180−190
+1922%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
−7300%
|
140−150
+7300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−7600%
|
154
+7600%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−5700%
|
110−120
+5700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1610%
|
170−180
+1610%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−2500%
|
180−190
+2500%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−631%
|
260−270
+631%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−4833%
|
140−150
+4833%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3700%
|
110−120
+3700%
|
| Dota 2 | 18−20
−2795%
|
550−600
+2795%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5
−2925%
|
120−130
+2925%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−3600%
|
140−150
+3600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
−1922%
|
180−190
+1922%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−1610%
|
170−180
+1610%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1400%
|
105
+1400%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−2956%
|
1100−1150
+2956%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
−3960%
|
200−210
+3960%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−2775%
|
115
+2775%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−3270%
|
300−350
+3270%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−2713%
|
450−500
+2713%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−3588%
|
290−300
+3588%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−5800%
|
55−60
+5800%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−5750%
|
110−120
+5750%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−3475%
|
140−150
+3475%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−4233%
|
130−140
+4233%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−771%
|
122
+771%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−3425%
|
280−290
+3425%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−3600%
|
70−75
+3600%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−2133%
|
65−70
+2133%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 119
+0%
|
119
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
This is how Quadro K510M and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5070 Mobile is 3733% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5070 Mobile is 3300% faster in 1440p
- RTX 5070 Mobile is 4500% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 5070 Mobile is 25100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5070 Mobile performs better in 47 tests (82%)
- there's a draw in 10 tests (18%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.53 | 46.96 |
| Recency | 23 July 2013 | on April 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
Quadro K510M has 66.7% lower power consumption.
RTX 5070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2969.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
