Radeon Instinct MI25 vs Quadro K5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5000 and Radeon Instinct MI25, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro K5000
2012, $2,499
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.67
+1.3%

K5000 outperforms MI25 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking505509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Power efficiency6.082.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 August 2012 (13 years ago)27 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15364096 ×2
Core clock speed706 MHz1400 MHz
Boost clock speed706 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate90.37384.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.169 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3264 ×2
TMUs128256 ×2
L1 Cache128 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1350 MHz852 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s436.2 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5000 9.67
+1.3%
Instinct MI25 9.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5000 4004
+1.3%
Samples: 688
Instinct MI25 3954
Samples: 9

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro K5000 11396
Instinct MI25 68562
+502%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro K5000 11138
Instinct MI25 71503
+542%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.67 9.55
Recency 17 August 2012 27 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro K5000 has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and 146% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI25, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro K5000 and Radeon Instinct MI25.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 114 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI25 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5000 or Radeon Instinct MI25, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.