Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K4200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
11.19
+18.7%

Quadro K4200 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking389436
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.67no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGK104Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data
Current price$311 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134496
Core clock speed771 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate87.81no data
Floating-point performance2,107 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K4200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA3.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+15.4%
26
−15.4%
1440p18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
4K14−16
+16.7%
12
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20
+25%
16−18
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Hitman 3 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Metro Exodus 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Hitman 3 22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 112
+24.4%
90−95
−24.4%
Metro Exodus 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+20%
70−75
−20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+40%
10−11
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+20%
10−11
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how Quadro K4200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K4200 is 15% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K4200 is 13% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro K4200 is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.19 9.43
Recency 22 July 2014 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 28 Watt

The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 141 vote

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 822 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.