GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Quadro K4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1200 K2000 K2000D K2200 K4000 K4200 K5000 K5000 Mac Edition K5000 SYNC K5200 K6000 K6000 SDI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
460 460 768MB 460 OEM 460 SE 460 SE v2 460 v2 460 v2 ES 460 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4000 with GeForce GTX 460 768MB, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4000
2013, $1,269
3 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
6.42
+62.5%

K4000 outperforms 460 768MB by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
GTX 460 768MB GTX 460 768MB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Power efficiency6.25no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK106no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768336
Core clock speed810 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate51.84no data
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1404 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+59.6%
47
−59.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Quadro K4000 and GTX 460 768MB compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K4000 is 60% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.42 3.95

Quadro K4000 has a 62.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro K4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
GRID K2 GRID K2
GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 768MB
vs
R7 250E Radeon R7 250E
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
vs
GeForce 820A GeForce 820A
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
vs
8400 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
HD 8570D HD 8570D
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
GTX 460 X2 GTX 460 X2
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
NVS 310 NVS 310
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
GTX 460 SE GTX 460 SE
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
ATI FireGL V7100 FireGL V7100
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
GTX 480 512 GTX 480 Core 512

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 205 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4000 or GeForce GTX 460 768MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.