To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K4000
Price now
177$
Games supported
67%
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 810 MHz
- Max video memory 3 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 5616 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 745 MHz
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
no data
Games supported
67%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in performance rating | 447 | 432 |
| Value for money | 1.55 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2013 (9 years old) | 28 June 2013 (9 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | $1,875 |
| Current price | $177 (0.1x MSRP) | no data |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GRID K280Q outperforms Quadro K4000 by 5% in Passmark.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K4000 and GRID K280Q. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 61 Mh/s | no data |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.21 kh/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 6.84 | 7.21 |
| Recency | 1 March 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Cost | $1269 | $1875 |
| Memory bus width | 192 | 256 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 1536 |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 | 160 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro K4000 by AMD
The nearest Quadro K4000's AMD equivalent is FirePro S7150, which is faster by 1% and higher by 5 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K4000:
Competitors of GRID K280Q by AMD
The nearest GRID K280Q's AMD equivalent is Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GRID K280Q:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
