Radeon Pro 570 vs Quadro K3100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K3100M and Radeon Pro 570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

K3100M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.75

Pro 570 outperforms K3100M by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602339
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Power efficiency5.399.42
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Polaris 20
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)5 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681792
Core clock speed706 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1105 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate45.18123.8
Floating-point processing power1.084 TFLOPS3.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs64112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s217.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K3100M 5.75
Pro 570 16.10
+180%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K3100M 2264
Pro 570 6336
+180%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K3100M 6066
Pro 570 27597
+355%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K3100M 3389
Pro 570 31844
+840%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−171%
95−100
+171%
4K15
−167%
40−45
+167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p57.11no data
4K133.27no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Fortnite 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Valorant 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−180%
260−270
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dota 2 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Fortnite 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Valorant 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Dota 2 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−157%
18−20
+157%
Valorant 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−162%
110−120
+162%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Valorant 60−65
−174%
170−180
+174%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−180%
14−16
+180%
Valorant 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how K3100M and Pro 570 compete in popular games:

  • Pro 570 is 171% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 570 is 167% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.75 16.10
Recency 23 July 2013 5 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt

K3100M has 60% lower power consumption.

Pro 570, on the other hand, has a 180% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K3100M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Quadro K3100M
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 129 votes

Rate Quadro K3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 60 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K3100M or Radeon Pro 570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.