Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Quadro K3000M

Place in the ranking	680	287
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.73	no data
Power efficiency	3.91	74.21
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GK104	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$155	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	1024
Core clock speed	654 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.39	91.20
Floating-point processing power	0.7534 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	89.6 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K3000M 4.27

T1200 Mobile 19.45
+356%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K3000M 2427

T1200 Mobile 14387
+493%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K3000M 11902

T1200 Mobile 44135
+271%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	33 −355%	150−160 +355%
Full HD	33 −75.8%	58 +75.8%
1440p	7−8 −371%	33 +371%
4K	16−18 −406%	81 +406%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.70	no data
1440p	22.14	no data
4K	9.69	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8

−357%

30−35
+357%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1075%	47 +1075%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −622%	65 +622%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −342%	50−55 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −373%	120−130 +373%
Hitman 3	10−11 −290%	35−40 +290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −114%	60 +114%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −382%	50−55 +382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −269%	59 +269%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −22.7%	54 +22.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −600%	28 +600%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −556%	59 +556%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −342%	50−55 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −373%	120−130 +373%
Hitman 3	10−11 −290%	35−40 +290%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −67.9%	47 +67.9%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −667%	65−70 +667%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −382%	50−55 +382%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −175%	44 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −344%	71 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −6.8%	47 +6.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −425%	21 +425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −357%	30−35 +357%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −522%	56 +522%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −373%	120−130 +373%
Hitman 3	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −131%	37 +131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +132%	19 −132%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−355%

50−55
+355%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −338%	35−40 +338%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −720%	41 +720%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1750%	110−120 +1750%
Hitman 3	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −350%	45−50 +350%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +117%	12 −117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−338%

35−40

+338%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Hitman 3	0−1	14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −10200%	100−110 +10200%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−320%

21−24

+320%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +0%	18 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how K3000M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 355% faster in 900p
T1200 Mobile is 76% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 371% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 406% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K3000M is 132% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 10200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

K3000M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
T1200 Mobile is ahead in 46 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 18 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.27	19.45
Recency	1 June 2012	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 355.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K3000M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.