GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Quadro K3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K3000M with GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, including specs and performance data.

K3000M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
3.90

RTX 3050 A Mobile outperforms K3000M by a whopping 609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking727224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.72no data
Power efficiency3.9646.83
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$155 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5761792
Core clock speed654 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1343 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate31.3975.21
Floating-point processing power0.7534 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4856
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Coresno data14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K3000M 3.90
RTX 3050 A Mobile 27.65
+609%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K3000M 1635
RTX 3050 A Mobile 11586
+609%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p33
−597%
230−240
+597%
Full HD37
−603%
260−270
+603%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.19no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Fortnite 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Valorant 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−604%
500−550
+604%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Dota 2 35−40
−594%
250−260
+594%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Fortnite 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−600%
70−75
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Valorant 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Dota 2 35−40
−594%
250−260
+594%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−608%
85−90
+608%
Valorant 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−596%
160−170
+596%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−600%
210−220
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−588%
220−230
+588%
Valorant 40−45
−607%
290−300
+607%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Sons of the Forest 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Valorant 20−22
−600%
140−150
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Dota 2 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Sons of the Forest 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

This is how K3000M and RTX 3050 A Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 597% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 603% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.90 27.65
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 3050 A Mobile has a 609% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
Quadro K3000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 70 votes

Rate Quadro K3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K3000M or GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.