GeForce GT 710 vs Quadro K2200M

Place in performance ranking	452	908
Place by popularity	not in top-100	49
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.05	0.04
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GK208B
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	19 July 2014 (9 years ago)	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$34.99
Current price	$228	$81 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K2200M has 10025% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	192
CUDA cores	no data	192
Core clock speed	667 MHz	954 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	26.68	15.26
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	366.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2200M and GeForce GT 710 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	no data	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	2.713" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Display Port	1.2	no data
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	no data	+
PureVideo	no data	+
PhysX	no data	+
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2200M 8.98
+451%

GT 710 1.63

Quadro K2200M outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K2200M 3468
+451%

GT 710 629

Quadro K2200M outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 451% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

K2200M 10787
+461%

GT 710 1924

Quadro K2200M outperforms GeForce GT 710 by 461% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 +400%	8 −400%
1440p	16−18 +433%	3 −433%
4K	30−35 +400%	6 −400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

+425%

4−5
−425%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Hitman 3	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +433%	14−16 −433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +400%	8 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Hitman 3	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +433%	14−16 −433%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +433%	3 −433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +440%	5 −440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +440%	5 −440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +433%	14−16 −433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +440%	5 −440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +433%	3 −433%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+433%

3−4
−433%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +440%	5 −440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+425%

4−5
−425%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%