Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro 460

Place in the ranking	491	483
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.69	9.61
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Baffin	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	30 October 2016 (8 years ago)	19 July 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	640
Core clock speed	850 MHz	667 MHz
Boost clock speed	907 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.05	26.68
Floating-point processing power	1.858 TFLOPS	0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
3D Vision Pro	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	-	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 460 8.98

K2200M 9.06
+0.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 460 3452

K2200M 3481
+0.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

38
+8.6%

35−40

−8.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Fortnite	50−55 +6%	50−55 −6%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
World of Tanks	130−140 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
World of Tanks	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +6.7%	30−33 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Valorant	21−24 +4.8%	21−24 −4.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Fortnite	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how Pro 460 and K2200M compete in popular games:

Pro 460 is 9% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.98	9.06
Recency	30 October 2016	19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

Pro 460 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

K2200M, on the other hand, has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 460 and Quadro K2200M.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.