UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Quadro K2200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
9.19
+49.7%

Quadro K2200 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking445549
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.081.29
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Alder Lake
GPU code nameGM107Alder Lake xG
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data
Current price$313 (0.8x MSRP)$878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K2200 has 139% better value for money than UHD Graphics 770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed1046 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1124 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9626.40
Floating-point performance1,439 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1550 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.19
+49.7%
UHD Graphics 770 6.14

Quadro K2200 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3550
+28.6%
UHD Graphics 770 2761

Quadro K2200 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
4K18−21
+28.6%
14
−28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+48.1%
27
−48.1%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+40%
25
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Hitman 3 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how Quadro K2200 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K2200 is 41% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K2200 is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.19 6.14
Recency 22 July 2014 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro K2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 384 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1066 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.