UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro K1200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Quadro K1200
2015
4GB 128-bit
7.55
+23.2%

Quadro K1200 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking493546
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation4.871.26
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Alder Lake
GPU code nameGM107Alder Lake xG
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 no data
Current price$124 (0.4x MSRP)$878

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K1200 has 287% better value for money than UHD Graphics 770.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51232
Core clock speed1058 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1124 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate35.9726.40
Floating-point performance1,151 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHz1550 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsmDP mDP mDP mDPNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model56.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K1200 7.55
+23.2%
UHD Graphics 770 6.13

Quadro K1200 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K1200 2922
+5.8%
UHD Graphics 770 2761

Quadro K1200 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
4K16−18
+23.1%
13
−23.1%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 7.55 6.13
Recency 28 January 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 84 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1002 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.