Radeon HD 8770M vs Quadro K2200

Place in performance ranking	445	744
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.08	0.35
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	GM107	Mars
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	16 November 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	no data
Current price	$313 (0.8x MSRP)	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K2200 has 780% better value for money than HD 8770M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	384
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	775 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	825 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	44.96	19.80
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	633.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2200 and Radeon HD 8770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	202 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

160−170
+196%

−196%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

+200%

6−7
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Hitman 3	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +189%	18−20 −189%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Hitman 3	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +189%	18−20 −189%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +189%	18−20 −189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +181%	16−18 −181%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+200%

7−8
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Hitman 3	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+200%

6−7
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1