Quadro P620 vs Tesla K8

Place in the ranking	516	524
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.01	16.98
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK104	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	16 September 2014 (11 years ago)	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	512
Core clock speed	693 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	811 MHz	1443 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	103.8	46.18
Floating-point processing power	2.491 TFLOPS	1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	128	32
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	145 mm
Width	1-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	96.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

45−50

−4.4%

47
+4.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	113 +0%	113 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	42 +0%	42 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	17 +0%	17 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +0%	32 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	83 +0%	83 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +0%	17 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

This is how Tesla K8 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 4% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.13	8.85
Recency	16 September 2014	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	40 Watt