Quadro T2000 Mobile vs K2200

Place in performance ranking	441	247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	2.89	4.69
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GM107	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	no data
Current price	$313 (0.8x MSRP)	$2221

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T2000 Mobile has 62% better value for money than Quadro K2200.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.96	114.2
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro K2200 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	202 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.17

T2000 Mobile 20.63
+125%

T2000 Mobile outperforms K2200 by 125% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3551

T2000 Mobile 7985
+125%

T2000 Mobile outperforms K2200 by 125% in Passmark.