GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro K2000D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5050 5060 5060 GB205 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 16 GB 5070 5070 Ti 5080 5090 5090 D 5090 DD 5090 D V2 5090 SE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000D with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

K2000D
2013, $599
2 GB GDDR5, 51 Watt
3.86

RTX 5060 outperforms K2000D by a whopping 1184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
K2000D K2000D
RTX 5060 RTX 5060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76570
Place by popularitynot in top-1001
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19100.00
Power efficiency5.8626.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGK107GB206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2013 (13 years ago)19 May 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 5060 has 52532% better value for money than K2000D.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843840
Core clock speed954 MHz2280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2497 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53299.6
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS19.18 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache32 KB3.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length202 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA3.012.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K2000D 3.86
RTX 5060 49.58
+1184%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2000D 1610
Samples: 180
RTX 5060 20657
+1183%
Samples: 14992

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1380%
148
+1380%
1440p5−6
−1260%
68
+1260%
4K3−4
−1500%
48
+1500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p59.90
−2865%
2.02
+2865%
1440p119.80
−2625%
4.40
+2625%
4K199.67
−3105%
6.23
+3105%
  • RTX 5060 has 2865% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 has 2625% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5060 has 3105% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 247
+0%
247
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Palworld 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 225
+0%
225
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 180
+0%
180
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 280
+0%
280
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 212
+0%
212
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Palworld 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 131
+0%
131
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106
+0%
106
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+0%
89
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Palworld 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how K2000D and RTX 5060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is 1380% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 is 1260% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5060 is 1500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.86 49.58
Recency 1 March 2013 19 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 145 Watt

K2000D has 184% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has a 1184% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000D in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000D is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
vs
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
NVS 315 NVIDIA NVS 315
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Quadro K2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2000
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
K2000D NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
K2000D NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile
Quadro K4000 NVIDIA Quadro K4000
vs
HD 6790 HD 6790
Quadro K600 NVIDIA Quadro K600
vs
Quadro K610M Quadro K610M
Quadro K600 NVIDIA Quadro K600
vs
R7 340 OEM R7 340 OEM
Quadro K600 NVIDIA Quadro K600
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4600 Ti 4600
NVS 510 NVIDIA NVS 510
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro K2000D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 8189 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2000D or GeForce RTX 5060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.