GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Quadro K2000D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4050 Max-Q 4050 Mobile 4060 Max-Q 4060 Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile 4070 Max-Q 4070 Mobile 4080 Max-Q 4080 Mobile 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Mobile 4090 Max-Q 4090 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2000D with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

K2000D
2013, $599
2 GB GDDR5, 51 Watt
3.86
RTX 4090 Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
64.92
+1582%

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms K2000D by a whopping 1582% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
K2000D K2000D
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency5.8641.85
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107AD103
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3849728
Core clock speed954 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53515.3
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs32304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache32 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K2000D 3.86
RTX 4090 Mobile 64.92
+1582%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2000D 1610
Samples: 180
RTX 4090 Mobile 27045
+1580%
Samples: 3199

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−1756%
167
+1756%
1440p7−8
−1700%
126
+1700%
4K4−5
−1825%
77
+1825%

Cost per frame, $

1080p66.56no data
1440p85.57no data
4K149.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+0%
147
+0%
Palworld 211
+0%
211
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 218
+0%
218
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240
+0%
240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Palworld 176
+0%
176
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 214
+0%
214
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+0%
133
+0%
Dota 2 199
+0%
199
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 156
+0%
156
+0%
Palworld 145
+0%
145
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394
+0%
394
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Dota 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 145
+0%
145
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 173
+0%
173
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 516
+0%
516
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 117
+0%
117
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 485
+0%
485
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 115
+0%
115
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314
+0%
314
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Palworld 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 67
+0%
67
+0%

This is how K2000D and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 1756% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 1700% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 1825% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.86 64.92
Recency 1 March 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 120 Watt

K2000D has 135% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1582% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000D in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000D is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
GTX 1070 GDDR5X 1070 GDDR5X
NVS 315 NVS 315
vs
RTX 5090 5090
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile A3000 Mobile
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
Radeon 760M 760M
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
RX 580 2048SP 580 2048SP
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
RTX 5060 5060
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
HD 6790 6790
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Quadro K610M K610M
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
R7 340 OEM 340 OEM
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4600 4600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro K2000D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 916 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2000D or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.